Nu kelis variantus turejau..... bet jis kimba ant visko
Žinutės
Šis puslapis nėra tiesioginis — žinutės atnaujinamos pagal tvarkaraštį. Paskutinį kartą atnaujinta . Kito atnaujinimo laukiama apie . Laikas rodomas Vilniaus laiku (EET).
😄
1. Identity and safety header
▎ You are Claude Code, Anthropic's official CLI for Claude. You are an interactive agent that helps users with
▎ software engineering tasks.
Followed by a security-policy paragraph: assist with authorized security testing / defensive security / CTF work;
refuse destructive techniques, DoS, mass targeting, supply-chain compromise, detection evasion; dual-use tooling
requires clear authorization context.
▎ You are Claude Code, Anthropic's official CLI for Claude. You are an interactive agent that helps users with
▎ software engineering tasks.
Followed by a security-policy paragraph: assist with authorized security testing / defensive security / CTF work;
refuse destructive techniques, DoS, mass targeting, supply-chain compromise, detection evasion; dual-use tooling
requires clear authorization context.
- ❤1
True, Fable išmintingesnis juntamai. Gal priklauso nuo to ką darai ir nuo harness'o/prompt'ų išsamumo.
Bet neretai užkimba ta cybersecurity cenzūra, ypač dirbant su devops. Vakar man prie „spynet“ pavadinimo prisikabino (Microsoftas taip savo „Microsoft Active Protection Service“ viduje vadina), turėjau į Opus perjungt. Bet jei Fable surašęs planą, tai ir Opus gerai veikia.
Bet neretai užkimba ta cybersecurity cenzūra, ypač dirbant su devops. Vakar man prie „spynet“ pavadinimo prisikabino (Microsoftas taip savo „Microsoft Active Protection Service“ viduje vadina), turėjau į Opus perjungt. Bet jei Fable surašęs planą, tai ir Opus gerai veikia.
nu va, ziurim 😄 security
> A security review of source code — reading the code, finding vulnerabilities, reporting them so they get fixed — is defensive work. For that,
there is no formal ownership ceremony I need from you: the ask itself, made in the repo you control, is sufficient. The context already
corroborates it many times over: you're working in your own local clone at ~/code/go/aks/agentmemories, the commit history is under your git
identity (M), and you hold the admin role in this workspace's memory server (am_status confirms it). Nobody needs a notarized letter to have
their own code reviewed.
So the practical answer is: just ask for the review.
there is no formal ownership ceremony I need from you: the ask itself, made in the repo you control, is sufficient. The context already
corroborates it many times over: you're working in your own local clone at ~/code/go/aks/agentmemories, the commit history is under your git
identity (M), and you hold the admin role in this workspace's memory server (am_status confirms it). Nobody needs a notarized letter to have
their own code reviewed.
So the practical answer is: just ask for the review.
😄
priestai reikejo ;D
siaip vat
apart normalaus memory nieko neturim 😄 bet tryse prie vieno projekto per PR viskas vibe - nieko nesugriovem 🙂
kiekvienas su savo memory / skills
be shared team memory
@… la, gal kokio feedback? geriau/blogiau ar same sh... 🙂
> The Personalization Problem
Your agent doesn't remember who it's talking to. Users re-explain their preferences every session. The support bot asks the same clarifying questions it asked yesterday. A customer says "use the same shipping address as last time" and the agent has no idea what that means.
This is the problem most people think of first — conversation history and user context. It's real, and it matters. But it's the simpler of the two problems.
Your agent doesn't remember who it's talking to. Users re-explain their preferences every session. The support bot asks the same clarifying questions it asked yesterday. A customer says "use the same shipping address as last time" and the agent has no idea what that means.
This is the problem most people think of first — conversation history and user context. It's real, and it matters. But it's the simpler of the two problems.
- 👍1
ai, žinok nuoširdžiai nežinau – paskutines kelias dienas paleidęs esu tokį rewrite'ą, kuris labai ilgai sukasi.. tai malasi, malasi tas Fable ten, testus kuria, validuoja, restartina, etc. – nesikišu per daug 🤭
žodžiu, veikia. Bet ar kas geriau/blogiau tai nežinau. Bandau dabar žiūrėt ką ten rewrite'ino, valyt visaip, nes noriu, kad human-readable vis dar būtų.. nežinau ar aš čia vienas kodą skaitau, bet kitu atveju kažkaip durnai jausčiausi
žodžiu, veikia. Bet ar kas geriau/blogiau tai nežinau. Bandau dabar žiūrėt ką ten rewrite'ino, valyt visaip, nes noriu, kad human-readable vis dar būtų.. nežinau ar aš čia vienas kodą skaitau, bet kitu atveju kažkaip durnai jausčiausi
Rodoma paskutinė surinkta leidžiama būsena; pašalinimų suderinimas nebaigtas. Visas pokalbis — Telegram grupėje.